WebSearch –Try: Management-Methods-Foresight-Prospective Studies-Roadmaps-Innovation.

Custom Search

My visitors whereabouts - tell me more via a comment or back link

New Scientist - Environment

Renewable energy : nature.com subject feeds

ScienceDirect Publication: Journal of CO2 Utilization

Shale Debate, UK

News - Steel Market Update - Steel Market Update

Monday 23 April 2012

GET MOTIVATED: HOW I FORMED, MOTIVATE and MAINTAIN MY INVOLVEMENT IN GW-CC ISSUES

HOW I FORMED, MOTIVATE & MAINTAIN MY INVOLVEMENT IN GW-CC ISSUES 


I must admit that as a non-expert in Climatology and much else, I have been an early convert to the mainstream view, impressed by the weight, competence of the professionals,not to mention the abundant peer reviewed publications and the International recognition of the importance of these issues (IPCC) , on par with the International Energy Agencies IEA-AEI(Fr)   IEA-GW-CC section, Let me add it appeared to me that:

1. On such a scale of possible consequences (mostly dire) that it would be better to play it safe and do something about it, preferably something sensible, rather than the "lets waitt and see" people.
(cf. RealClimate article below)
2. As a professional R and D scientist and engineer, experienced both in the Lab. and in industry (the latter a bit grimy), I know for a fact, that it is easier, but not necessarily better, to pollute than not pollute. (Scientists have an explanation for our collective incompetence it is called Entropy).
3. I feel that I would be better for me (and my colleagues retired or otherwise employed) to concentrate on what  as a professionals in metallurgy (great recyclers) materials science, labs or industrialists to put our expert knowledge to use in our discipline. To do so one must have a good grasp of  the GW-CC issues.
4. As Scientists, the scientific mind requires that we remain informed and inquisitive, if not skeptical, of inevitable evolution in this fairly new (at least to the general public) and highly complex field by its shear dimension, and possible consequences.
5. We have ample experience success in all sorts of pollution activity (natural and easy) but little of pollution avoidance and depollution (needs much energy, invention and innovation)
6. An early road map was drawn up by Socolow and Pacala  Wedge Approaches with lead to the creation of The Carbon Mitigation Initiative at Princeton Uni.



RealClimate: The high cost of inaction

www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/.../the-cost-of-inaction...
14 Oct 2011 – “Unfortunately, the original wedges approach greatly underestimates needed reductions. In part, that is because Pacala and Socolow built their ...


Hope you enjoy reading me,

Cheers.  

2 comments:

  1. Hi… that was great stuff.. I really like this subject. Could you tell me more… I would love to explore.
    _________________________
    Interim Manager

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for you interest Angela and for your link to Interim Managemnt-Flexible Resources Associates. Nice approach.

      Would you like to explore "More on Motivation or on Global Warming and Climate Change?"

      Perhaps I can be of more tangible service to the Associates and their clients and potential clients

      In the meantime for the historical origins to my rude awakening to the GW-CC issue, please vist
      Conversations-on-Innovations
      http://conversations-on-innovations.blogspot.fr/
      (in english)
      and The Meallurgists and Materials Scientists Technologists and Engineering contributions focused on alleviating such Global Issues.
      http://materialsscienceengineeringdefined.blogspot.fr/

      Delete

Comments, questions and/or suggestions welcome. If I can be of further, more focused assistance, do not hesitate-ask. Comments are moderated to assist further enquiry and assistance.